When the news hit that funding for the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) was being cut, the internet exploded. Social feeds turned into battlefields. “This is a war on women’s health!” “They’re trying to erase menopause research!” “Estrogen is dangerous again?!”
Sound familiar?
If you’ve lived through decades of dismissive healthcare, if you’ve been misinformed or mistreated, this hit hard—and fast. The outrage made sense. The panic? Understandable.
But here’s the thing: it wasn’t the whole story. And we need to talk about why rushing to outrage does more harm than good—especially for the very people we’re trying to protect.
What Actually Happened With the WHI Funding
Let’s zoom out.
In mid-April 2025, reports surfaced that the NIH had cut funding for the Women’s Health Initiative—the largest and longest-running study on postmenopausal women’s health. For many, this looked like a targeted attack. Social media picked it up and ran with it.
It didn’t help that we’ve all seen women’s health dismissed before. We’ve seen care denied. Research underfunded. Hormones misrepresented.
But on April 24, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced that it was restoring the funding.
It wasn’t a political attack.
It wasn’t an organized takedown of menopause research.
It was an internal budgeting error that overshot its contract reductions. In short: someone messed up, realized it, and reversed course.
Panic? Premature.
The WHI: Both Important and Imperfect
Now, to be clear: the WHI matters. It’s given us decades of data on cardiovascular disease, bone health, and cancer risk in women over 50. But it’s also the same initiative that helped fuel a massive hormone panic in the early 2000s.
In 2002, their study linked hormone therapy (HRT) with increased breast cancer risk. Headlines went wild. Doctors stopped prescribing HRT practically overnight. Millions of women were left confused, unsupported, and afraid.
Later reviews showed the data was a lot more nuanced than those headlines suggested. Estrogen alone wasn’t the villain. But the damage was already done—and that myth still lingers today.
So yes, it’s complicated. The WHI has helped and hurt. But to say its defunding would signal the end of women’s health research? That was a stretch. And one that spread fast.
The Real Problem: Fear Goes Viral Faster Than Facts
What we witnessed wasn’t just reaction—it was performance. Social media rewards speed, not depth. So the loudest voices weren’t the ones saying, “Let’s wait for more info.” They were the ones yelling “Emergency!” without fact-checking first.
And it’s not just about this one event. It’s about what happens when we treat every headline like a five-alarm fire.
We lose credibility. We exhaust our audiences. We muddy the waters for people who are already trying to swim through medical misinformation.
Fear doesn’t equal leadership.
And in the long run, it weakens the movement we’re trying to build.
So, Whose Fault Is It?
This is where it gets interesting—and maybe a little uncomfortable.
A) The Administration
Kind of. Bureaucratic fumbles are practically expected at this point. The NIH didn’t explain the contract cuts well, and that left room for worst-case-scenario thinking. Should they have been clearer? Yes. Should they have seen the potential fallout coming? Also yes.
But was this a targeted assault on women’s health? No. Not even close.
B) Social Media
Absolutely. Social media algorithms don’t care about your bone density or your hormone health. They care about outrage and shares. Fear travels faster than nuance, and platforms are built to exploit that.
C) You (Yes, You)
If you reshared a post about the "end of menopause research" without fact-checking, you contributed too. It doesn’t make you a bad person—it makes you a normal person in a broken system. But part of growing into better advocacy is owning that impulse and slowing it down.
The answer? D) All of the above.
The administration needs to communicate better.
Social media needs a soul (good luck).
And we need to be better stewards of the information we pass along.
Because the real power isn’t in panicking.
It’s in pausing, getting clear, and responding with truth.
How to Respond Instead of React
If you’re someone who cares about the health and rights of women and people in midlife (which I’m guessing you are if you’re here), then let’s talk strategy. Not spin. Not panic. Strategy.
1. Sit With It First
Every piece of health news doesn’t require an instant opinion. Pause. Read beyond the headline. Ask who’s reporting, and who stands to gain from the outrage.
2. Find the Sources, Not the Echoes
Don’t rely on viral posts or thirdhand commentary. Look for original reporting—like the NPR update confirming WHI funding was reinstated. Bookmark sites like Science.org or STAT News for deeper coverage.
3. Speak to Build, Not Burn
Anger is easy. Building trust is harder. If you’re sharing health content, especially in the menopause space, your audience deserves accuracy more than adrenaline.
The Real Fight Isn’t Over—But It’s Bigger Than This
The WHI scare wasn’t nothing. It reminded us how fragile our systems still are. Women’s health is still underfunded. Menopause care is still siloed. And yes, our medical institutions still need deep accountability.
But accountability starts with clarity. With knowing what actually happened before we add to the wildfire. We don’t need to panic to be powerful. We need to be precise.
Let’s Lead With Facts—and Fire
You don’t need to repost every shocking headline to show you care. You don’t need to fan the flames to fight for better research. You’re allowed to pause, read, think, and then speak.
In fact, that pause might be the most radical thing we can do right now.
Because the real power? It’s in staying grounded when the internet wants you spinning.
Want more grounded insights like this, made for midlife athletes and changemakers?
Join my newsletter, or check out my guide on learning how to train your Central Governor to learn how to think more critically, not just on the run but in every day life too.